TL;DR
Get health and wellness essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Sixty and Me article identifies potential, choice and purpose as three skills that can help people live well while facing adversity. The author bases the framework on interviews with people who experienced challenges and loss; the piece presents personal observations, not a new research study testing the skills.
Sixty and Me has published a report naming potential, choice and purpose as three skills that may help people live well through hardship. The author says the framework grew out of interviews with people coping with loss and other challenges, while emphasizing that it reflects observations and personal accounts rather than a study measuring the skills’ effects.
The article’s author says the project began with interviews about how people handled challenges and loss and continued living through them. The accounts later informed a book, Living Well Despite Adversity: Inspiration for Finding Renewed, Meaning, and Joy in Your Life. The report presents resilience as something that can be developed, rather than a quality people either have or lack.
The first proposed skill is seeing potential beyond current limits. The author argues that beliefs such as “I can’t” can restrict people’s sense of what remains possible, while problem-solving and creativity may open other paths. Gabriel Gordell, whom the article describes as having traveled 3,000 miles in 99 days in a manual wheelchair, is quoted as saying: “It never crossed my mind that being in a wheelchair is bigger than me as a person.”
The second skill is recognizing that, even when people cannot control what happens, they may have choices about how they respond. The third is finding or rebuilding purpose after a major change. The report illustrates that point with Julia Fox Garrison, who says after a near-fatal stroke at age 37: “What I need to do is impact someone in a positive way every single day.”
How the Three Skills May Help
The framework offers readers a practical way to think about coping without suggesting that mindset can erase hardship. Potential, choice and purpose focus attention on areas a person may be able to influence, even when the original loss or circumstance cannot be changed. That distinction can matter during grief, illness, disability or other disruptions, when a person’s previous plans and sense of identity may no longer fit.
The report also highlights that purpose may need to change over time. Sherri Mandell, reflecting on the murder of her son Koby, says: “Each day I have to work to go on; each day I decide to live.” She adds that she works to “bless the person I have become.” Her account underscores the article’s point that coping does not require returning to who someone was before a loss.
These examples are personal accounts, not proof that any one approach works for everyone. The article’s value is in offering a vocabulary for reflection and adaptation; it does not establish a clinical method or guarantee recovery.
Products Worth Considering
Withings BPM Vision Blood Pressure Monitor with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart 9300 Electric Toothbrush, Black
BowFlex Results Series SelectTech Adjustable Dumbbells (Pair)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Article’s Happiness Framework
The report challenges the idea that happiness rises and falls in direct proportion to life circumstances. It describes the return toward a familiar level of wellbeing after a positive change as adaptation, and says that a new job or relationship may bring an initial lift that does not necessarily last. This is offered as background for why the author looks beyond external events when considering long-term wellbeing.
To support that argument, the article attributes a “pie of happiness” estimate to psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky: 50% genetics, 10% circumstances and 40% intentional behavior, attitudes and beliefs. The supplied report does not identify a particular study, explain how those percentages were calculated, or provide details about the populations or conditions behind the estimate. The figures should therefore be understood as the article’s attributed summary, not as a precise prediction of any individual’s happiness.
The author says interviews with people facing adversity shaped the three-part framework. The report also maintains that resilience can be strengthened, comparing its development to building a muscle. It does not detail a formal training program or measure changes in resilience among the interviewees.
“It never crossed my mind that being in a wheelchair is bigger than me as a person.”
— Gabriel Gordell, as quoted in the Sixty and Me report
What the Report Does Not Establish
The supplied article does not provide the publication date, the interview count, a research method, or evidence comparing outcomes among people who use these approaches and those who do not. It also does not establish that potential, choice and purpose are the only skills relevant to living through adversity, or that they will help every person in the same way.
The happiness percentages are attributed to Lyubomirsky, but the report gives no study citation or methodological detail for readers to assess the estimate. The personal accounts show how several individuals describe their experiences; they cannot establish a general cause-and-effect relationship between these skills and wellbeing.
Applying the Ideas in Daily Life
The report does not announce a follow-up study or a planned next step. Instead, it invites readers to reflect on what helps them live through challenges, whether they believe a meaningful life remains possible during pain, and how they might build resilience. Its practical direction is to look for a manageable choice, an area of untapped potential, or a source of purpose without treating any of these as a substitute for support.
The author points readers to the film The Pursuit of Happyness as a source of inspiration and asks them to share their experiences. The supplied source does not indicate whether additional interviews, research findings or resources are forthcoming.
Key Questions
What three skills does the report identify?
It identifies potential, choice and purpose: seeing possibilities beyond current limits, deciding how to respond to circumstances, and finding or rebuilding meaning.
Is the article reporting a new scientific study?
No. The author describes interviews with people who faced challenges and loss, then presents observations drawn from those accounts. The supplied report does not describe a controlled study testing the three skills.
Does the report say people can control whether adversity happens?
No. Its point is that people may have some choice in how they respond to events, not that they can prevent or control every hardship.
Where do the happiness percentages come from?
The report attributes a breakdown of 50% genetics, 10% circumstances and 40% intentional behavior, attitudes and beliefs to psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky. It does not cite the underlying study or explain the estimate’s methods.
Source: sixtyandme.com
