TL;DR
Get health and wellness essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
An herb farmer and cosmetic formulator has highlighted calendula, green tea, fennel, hops and lavender as plants of interest for skincare. The report describes research into possible skin effects, but the findings do not establish that homegrown herbs or products made with them will produce the same results.
A report published by Sixty and Me profiles five herbs associated with skincare—calendula, green tea, fennel, hops and lavender—and summarizes research into their possible effects on skin. The author, an herb farmer and cosmetic formulator, says some of the plants are grown on her Colorado farm, while green tea is not suited to its climate; the account is a practical perspective, not evidence that every herb-based product delivers the reported benefits.
The author describes calendula as a favorite skincare plant, pointing to its carotenoids, flavonoids and other compounds. The report says research on calendula extracts has examined wound healing, skin repair, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity, hydration and elasticity. It also cites laboratory findings related to UVB-associated oxidative damage and collagen. These are findings about extracts and research preparations; the report does not specify that they apply to every formulation or to plants used directly on skin.
Green tea is the exception among the five: the author says she does not grow it because it needs warmer conditions than those on her Colorado farm. Its catechins, including EGCG, have been studied for antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. The report also describes research into topical preparations and photoaging-related effects. Fennel studies cited in the article address hydration, water loss through skin, texture, redness and pigmentation. The source does not give study sizes or enough detail to compare the strength of evidence across these outcomes.
The remaining plants are hops and lavender. The report says topical hops preparations have been studied for hydration, redness, pigmentation and the appearance of wrinkles, and notes research interest in compounds with phytoestrogenic activity. Lavender is presented partly through aromatherapy research on relaxation, anxiety and sleep, with the author also describing its use in hydrosol. The account characterizes evidence as varying by preparation and circumstances. It does not provide clinical details or establish that lavender hydrosol treats a skin condition.
Local Herbs, Skincare Claims
The report connects ingredient sourcing with both consumer interest in botanical skincare and the practical question of where ingredients come from. The author says growing and processing some botanicals on the farm can shorten the supply chain and reduce packaging and transportation tied to purchasing small quantities of prepackaged ingredients. She also describes using regenerative agriculture and protecting the land, though the article does not quantify environmental effects or compare them with other sourcing methods.
For readers, the distinction between a plant’s research record and a finished product matters. Studies may examine a particular extract, concentration or preparation, while creams and lotions combine ingredients in specific formulations. The source gives a useful account of why a formulator selects these plants, but it does not establish that a homemade preparation will match study results or suit every person’s skin.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Colorado Farm to Formulation
The report is written from the perspective of someone who says she has spent years working as an herb farmer and cosmetic formulator. She identifies several of the plants as crops at Colorado Aromatics, while explicitly noting that green tea is not grown there because of climate. Her account combines descriptions of botanical research with personal experience growing and processing ingredients.
“Farm to skin,” as the author uses the phrase, refers to more than plant-based ingredients. It includes growing useful plants, understanding their chemistry, considering research and deciding whether they belong in a formulated product. The article does not name individual studies, provide publication dates or report a new clinical trial, regulatory decision or product launch. Its development is an explanatory report about ingredient choices and the evidence the author says informs them.
““Plants are remarkably sophisticated chemical factories.””
— The report’s author
Evidence and Product Effects
The report does not provide citations, study designs, sample sizes, concentrations or treatment periods for the research it summarizes. It is therefore not possible from the article alone to assess how strong or consistent the evidence is, or whether findings from extracts and laboratory work translate to particular retail products. The author’s descriptions of reported effects should not be read as proof that a product will heal wounds, prevent sun damage or change pigmentation.
It is also unclear how much local growing reduces environmental impacts in practice: the report gives no figures for transport, water use, processing or packaging. It does not discuss safety testing, allergies, product preservation or how the featured ingredients are formulated. Those details can differ by product and preparation.
More Detail on Studies and Sourcing
The source does not announce a follow-up study or a new product, so no next milestone is specified. Readers seeking to evaluate the claims can look for study references and formulation details from the author or product makers, including which plant part and extract were used, at what concentration and in what type of study. Further information on the farm’s growing and processing practices would also help clarify the sustainability claims.
Until such details are available, the report is best understood as an account of five botanical ingredients and the research interests around them—not as a guarantee of skincare outcomes. Individual products and people’s responses may differ.
Key Questions
Which five herbs does the report discuss?
It discusses calendula, green tea, fennel, hops and lavender. The author says several grow on her Colorado farm but that she does not grow green tea there.
Does the report prove these herbs improve skin?
No. It summarizes research described by the author, but does not provide study citations or enough detail to judge the evidence. Findings for specific extracts or preparations do not establish that every product will have the same effect.
Why does the author grow herbs for skincare?
She says local growing and processing can shorten ingredient supply chains and reduce some packaging and transportation associated with buying prepackaged botanicals. The article does not quantify those effects.
Does the report announce a new skincare product or study?
No. It is an explanatory report about plants the author finds useful and research related to them. The source does not announce a new product, clinical trial or other milestone.
Source: rss
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
