TL;DR
Get health and wellness essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A study published in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs estimates that people who average 14 alcoholic drinks a week face a 1-in-25 lifetime risk of dying from alcohol-related causes. The researchers found no significant overall health benefit from alcohol at any consumption level, while emphasizing that the estimates describe population risks, not an individual’s prognosis.
A study published in the Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs estimates that people who average 14 alcoholic drinks a week face a 1-in-25 lifetime risk of dying from alcohol-related causes. The analysis, commissioned originally to inform U.S. dietary recommendations, also found no significant overall health-protective effect from alcohol at any level of consumption, according to the researchers.
The researchers assessed health risks across a range of drinking levels, examining conditions and injuries linked to alcohol. They reported that consuming up to seven drinks per week was associated with only small increases in risk for most health conditions in their analysis. At higher consumption, risks were more pronounced; the study’s estimate for an average of 14 drinks weekly was a 1-in-25 lifetime chance of alcohol-related death.
The team reviewed more than 7,200 scientific publications on alcohol-associated illnesses and injuries. Medical experts used that evidence to estimate risks for individual conditions, then combined the estimates with national health data and statistical models to assess how different consumption levels relate to serious illness and premature death among Americans.
The outcomes considered included cancers such as oral, esophageal and breast cancer, as well as cardiovascular and liver disease and injuries. Lead author Kevin Shield said the researchers did not find a significant protective effect across health outcomes at any level of drinking. He noted that possible lower risks of ischemic heart disease and stroke at low consumption did not outweigh risks from cancer and other chronic diseases when considered together.
How the Risk Estimates Inform Drinking
The analysis provides estimates of alcohol-related risks across drinking levels, an area the researchers say is not addressed with a specific numerical threshold in current U.S. dietary guidance. The guidelines advise Americans to “limit alcoholic beverages”. Earlier versions recommended no more than two drinks per day for men and one for women.
Co-author Timothy Naimi said the study was designed to provide estimates across the drinking spectrum. He said that two drinks a day, which some people may consider moderate, is associated in the analysis with a substantially elevated risk of premature death caused by alcohol. The researchers reported that risk tends to rise with consumption and did not identify a risk-free level.
The findings also address whether low-level drinking may improve health, particularly heart health. The researchers concluded that possible cardiovascular advantages do not amount to an overall health benefit when other alcohol-associated conditions are included. Evidence about one disease outcome does not establish an overall health benefit.
Products Worth Considering
Withings Sleep Under-Mattress Sleep Tracking Pad
Oral-B iO Series 5 Rechargeable Electric Toothbrush with Travel Case and 3 Brush Heads, Black
Bowflex PR1000 Home Gym
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Dietary Review to Population Estimates
The Alcohol Intake and Health Study was originally commissioned by the U.S. federal government to help shape updated national dietary recommendations. The resulting guidelines use a general instruction to limit alcohol, rather than naming a particular weekly amount. The new study provides estimates that the authors say can help people interpret how risks change across consumption levels.
Its conclusions come from a synthesis of prior evidence, not a trial assigning people to drink different amounts. Researchers combined findings on diseases and injuries already associated with alcohol with national health data, then used models to calculate population-level risks. The work was conducted by researchers in the United States and Canada and published in a journal issued at Rutgers University.
Those methods provide a broad assessment, but they do not make the estimates predictions for every person. Shield said individual outcomes can vary with genetics, lifestyle, drinking patterns and other choices. The study’s figures should therefore be read as estimates for populations, rather than a personalized forecast.
“Even low levels of alcohol use come with health risks. And that risk continues to increase the more someone drinks.”
— Kevin Shield, lead study author and associate professor at the University of Toronto
Limits of the Alcohol Risk Estimates
The study reports population-level estimates; it cannot specify an individual’s likelihood of illness or death. Personal risk may differ with drinking patterns and other factors, and the supplied report does not provide detailed confidence intervals or a complete breakdown of absolute risks for every condition and consumption level.
The researchers also said some possible alcohol-related effects remain under investigation. Shield cited emerging evidence concerning pancreatic cancer as an area where more work is needed to understand the relationship and alcohol’s contribution. The reported estimates cover conditions already established as linked to alcohol and should not be treated as a final accounting of every possible outcome.
The comparison between seven and 14 drinks per week also needs careful reading: the report describes small increases for most conditions at up to seven drinks and a lifetime death-risk estimate at 14 drinks. It does not provide a single individual-level risk calculation or establish that everyone at a given consumption level faces the same outcome.
Further Evidence and Guideline Decisions
Further research may refine estimates for conditions where evidence is still developing, including pancreatic cancer. Such research could clarify alcohol’s contribution to those risks and whether future population-level assessments should include them.
The study was designed to inform discussion of U.S. dietary recommendations, but the supplied report does not say that officials have changed the guidelines in response or announce a date for a revision. Current published guidance advises people to limit alcoholic beverages, while the study provides additional estimates for comparing drinking levels.
The researchers concluded that drinking less reduces exposure to alcohol-related harm, while an individual’s risk also depends on factors beyond weekly intake. The analysis does not identify a completely safe amount or provide individualized medical advice.
Key Questions
What does the study estimate for 14 drinks a week?
It estimates that people averaging 14 drinks per week have a 1-in-25 lifetime risk of dying from alcohol-related causes. This is a population estimate, not a prediction for any one person.
Did researchers find a health benefit from light drinking?
The researchers reported no significant protective effect across health outcomes at any consumption level. They said possible lower risks for some cardiovascular conditions did not outweigh risks from cancer and other diseases in the overall assessment.
Does the study say that seven drinks a week is safe?
No. The report says up to seven drinks per week was linked to small increases in risk for most conditions studied. It does not identify a completely safe level of alcohol consumption.
Can the estimates show my personal risk?
No. The figures describe risks across populations. The researchers said individual risk can vary with genetics, lifestyle, drinking patterns and other factors.
Have U.S. drinking guidelines changed because of the study?
The supplied report does not announce a guideline change. Current U.S. dietary guidance advises people to limit alcoholic beverages without specifying a numerical threshold.
Source: sciencedaily.com
